Longer enrollment tops list of proposed marketplace improvements


EDIT, September 17, 2021: CMS has finalized the 2022 rules, mostly as proposed. (See the final rule, and a summary fact sheet.)

  • The extra month of open enrollment has been finalized, although CMS has added flexibility for state-run exchanges. They can choose to extend open enrollment as well, but they also have the option to use any deadline as long as it’s not earlier than December 15. Most of the state-run exchanges tend to extend their open enrollment windows, although there are a few that normally opt end open enrollment prior to mid-January.
  • The year-round open enrollment period for households earning up to 150% of the poverty level has been finalized. But CMS notes that this special enrollment period will only remain in effect as long as the American Rescue Plan’s subsidy enhancements are available, allowing people at this income level to obtain $0 premium benchmark plans. For now, that’s through the end of 2022, although it appears likely that Congress will extend that. 
  • CMS plans to issued guidance related to standardized health plans in the 2023 rulemaking. The proposed 2023 rules will be issued this winter, and finalized next spring. There was not time to create standardized plans for 2022, as insurers had already submitted their 2022 plan proposals last spring, and regulators have been reviewing the rates and plans all summer, in preparation for open enrollment that begins in November.
  • The separate billing requirement for abortion coverage has been repealed.
  • The relaxed guardrails for Section 1332 waivers have been repealed.
  • The Exchange Direct Enrollment option has been repealed.

Each year, HHS issues a set of rules and guidelines that apply to the health insurance exchanges created by the Affordable Care Act, and to the health plans that are sold in the individual/family market. The rule-making process includes a proposed rule, a public comment period, and then a final rule. This is normally a fairly straightforward process, but it’s been more complicated for the upcoming 2022 plan year.

The Trump administration issued the proposed 2022 rules in late November last year, and finalized some of them in January, just before inauguration day. In May, the Biden administration finalized the rest of the proposed rule changes, but noted that they intended to propose a new set of rules, with a new public comment period, in order to revisit some of the changes that had been finalized by the outgoing administration.

In late June, the Biden administration published the new proposed rules, and opened a new public comment period that continued through July 28. A total of 341 comments were submitted, and are under review by HHS.

Some of the new proposals are direct reversals of the rule changes that the Trump administration had made. Others are new ideas that are designed to help more people gain access to affordable health insurance. For various provisions, HHS notes that there are pros and cons to the proposals they’re making, and are seeking public feedback before any rules are finalized.

As is always the case, some of the proposed rules are more “behind the scenes” and wouldn’t be particularly noticeable to consumers. But there are some that would directly affect consumers, mostly by making it easier to enroll in health coverage.

How about an extra month of open enrollment?

For the last several years, the standard open enrollment period has been set at November 1 – December 15. This is the schedule that’s used by HealthCare.gov (the exchange/marketplace in 36 states), although Washington, DC and 14 states run their own exchange platforms and most of them tend to extend open enrollment.

HHS has now proposed adding an extra month to open enrollment, so that it would continue through January 15 instead of ending in mid-December. If finalized, this rule change would take effect for the upcoming open enrollment period that starts in November, for coverage effective in 2022.

HHS clarifies that the intent here is to give people more time to enroll, and give enrollment assisters more time to help everyone who needs it. They also point out that some people don’t realize how much their premiums might change from one year to the next, and are caught off guard when they get their invoice in January. By that point, however, it’s normally too late to change plans, and people might end up dropping their coverage altogether if it’s become too expensive. By giving people until January 15 to enroll, there’s time for a “do-over” if a policy was allowed to auto-renew and then ended up being more expensive than expected.

On the other hand, HHS notes that when enrollment ends in mid-December, everyone has full-year coverage, with policies that take effect in January. If enrollment is extended until mid-January, some enrollees will have coverage that takes effect in February instead. Most of the state-run exchanges already offer this, but it would take additional outreach and communication to ensure that consumers are aware that they would still need to enroll by mid-December in order to have coverage in effect as of January 1.

Year-round enrollment for people with income up to 150% FPL

HHS has proposed an ongoing enrollment opportunity for applicants with household income that doesn’t exceed 150% of the federal poverty level. If finalized, this would allow eligible applicants to enroll in coverage at any time of the year. (Under current rules, enrollment outside of the normal open enrollment period requires a special enrollment period, triggered by a qualifying life event).

This enrollment opportunity would be offered through the federally run exchange (HealthCare.gov), and state-run exchanges would have the option to offer it. HHS has clarified that it’s uncertain whether this could be added as an option for the 2022 plan year. It might need to be delayed until 2023 to give health plan actuaries adequate time to prepare for this change.

The American Rescue Plan, enacted earlier this year, has enhanced the ACA’s premium tax credits (premium subsidies) for 2021 and 2022, providing more financial help for people who buy their own health insurance. As a result, households with income up to 150% of the federal poverty level are eligible for subsidies that fully cover the cost of the benchmark plan.

That means they can select either of the two lowest-cost Silver plans and have no monthly premium. (They will also tend to have access to a variety of premium-free Bronze plans, and possibly some premium-free Gold plans. But Silver plans are generally the best option for people in this income range, due to the robust cost-sharing reductions that come with Silver plans.)

HHS notes that the enhanced premium subsidies would help to prevent adverse selection, since most applicants with household income up to 150% of FPL would be able to enroll in Silver plans — with strong cost-sharing reductions — without premiums. This means that they would be unlikely to drop their coverage after receiving medical care, as they would not have to pay anything to keep the coverage in force. (This would be applicable for 2022, assuming the year-round enrollment option could be added for 2022. For 2023 and future years, the availability of zero-premium Silver plans will depend on whether Congress extends the American Rescue Plan’s subsidy enhancements.)

However, HHS does note that some enrollees with income up to 150% of FPL do have to pay at least minimal premiums for the benchmark plan. This includes people in states where additional services beyond essential health benefits are required to be covered (and thus the premium subsidy doesn’t cover the entire cost of the benchmark plan) as well as applicants who are subject to a tobacco surcharge.

And it’s also possible for a person earning up to 150% of FPL to purchase a Silver plan that’s more expensive than the benchmark plan, and thus have a monthly premium even after the subsidy is applied.

It’s possible that there could be some adverse selection among these populations, with enrollees potentially dropping their coverage or shifting to a lower-cost plan after their medical needs are resolved. HHS is seeking public comments about how to best approach this.

It’s worth noting that Medicaid and CHIP enrollment is already available year-round, as is Basic Health Program enrollment in the two states where it’s available. In most states, Medicaid is available to adults under age 65 with household income up to 138% of the poverty level. The income caps are higher for children to qualify for Medicaid, and CHIP is available to children (and in some cases, pregnant women) in many middle-class households.

So a family with low or modest income can obtain coverage year-round in most states — for the children, and possibly the adults. This is true even though many CHIP programs — and some Medicaid programs — charge premiums. Extending open enrollment to run year-round for subsidy-eligible applicants with household income up to 150% of the poverty level would essentially just be an expansion of the enrollment eligibility rules that already exist for lower-income households.

Including the ACA’s expansion of Medicaid, health insurance exchanges, and Basic Health Programs, ACA enrollment now encompasses about 10% of all Americans. But there are still millions of Americans — most of whom have fairly low incomes — who are uninsured and possibly unaware of the financial assistance that’s available to them. HHS is working to make coverage as accessible as possible to this population, and the proposed year-round enrollment window is part of that approach.

Standardized plans return to HealthCare.gov for 2023

Five years ago, HealthCare.gov debuted standardized health plans, dubbed “Simple Choice” plans. The idea was to make it easier for consumers to compare apples to apples when looking at multiple health insurance policy options.

The Trump administration finalized a rule change in 2018 that eliminated Simple Choice plans starting with the 2019 plan year. So HHS did not create standardized plan designs for the last few years.

The 2018 rule change that eliminated standardized plan designs on HealthCare.gov was vacated by a court ruling earlier this year, as were three other provisions of the 2018 rule. So HHS is starting the process of once again creating standardized plans and gathering public feedback on how to best proceed.

And earlier this month, President Biden issued a wide-ranging executive order aimed at promoting competition in the U.S. economy. One of its provisions calls for HHS to “implement standardized options in the national Health Insurance Marketplace and any other appropriate mechanisms to improve competition and consumer choice.”

When standardized plans were previously available in the federally run exchange, it was optional for insurers to offer them and insurers were also free to offer a variety of non-standardized plans. The specifics of their reintroduction are unclear at this point, but the proposed rules seem to indicate that the plans, which are expected to be available for the 2023 plan year, will continue to be optional for insurers.

Consumer protection rules

Some of the other proposed rule changes are designed to protect consumers, although their implementation might not be obvious.

Over the last few years, HHS had implemented several regulatory changes that would have eroded various consumer protections or created confusion in the marketplace. But these rules have either been blocked by the courts or had little in the way of interest from states. And now HHS has proposed a reversal of some of them:

  • Insurers are required to collect at least $1/month in premiums to cover the cost of non-Hyde abortion coverage if it’s offered by a health plan. Premium subsidies can’t cover this amount, and insurers must keep the funds segregated from the rest of the premiums they collect. But a previous rule change required insurers to actually send separate invoices for this amount. A judge blocked that rule last year before it took effect, noting that it would lead to widespread consumer confusion. And now HHS is proposing that the rule simply be eliminated altogether. Insurers would still have to segregate the premiums for abortion services, and they still cannot be covered by premium subsidies. But no separate invoice would be required.
  • The consumer protection guardrails for 1332 waivers were significantly relaxed in 2018. Few states had expressed interest in utilizing the new rules (the vast majority of 1332 waiver proposals have continued to be for reinsurance programs), but HHS is now proposing that the more stringent 1332 waiver guardrails be restored.
  • In January, the outgoing Trump administration finalized a program known as “Exchange Direct Enrollment,” designed to allow states to abandon their ACA-created exchanges altogether and rely instead on broker and insurer websites. (Note that this is not the same thing as enhanced direct enrollment, which continues to be an option utilized by dozens of enrollment entities.) HHS has now proposed eliminating the Exchange Direct Enrollment option. The public feedback on the Exchange Direct Enrollment program was almost entirely negative, and no states had expressed an interest in pursuing this idea. (Georgia had already received approval for a 1332 waiver utilizing this concept. That approval is now under review by the Biden administration.)

The final version of the new rules is expected to be published within the next several weeks. We won’t know the status of these proposed rule changes until then, but the proposed changes we’ve discussed here are fairly likely to be finalized, albeit with possible modifications based on public comments that HHS received.


Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.





Source link